{"created":"2023-06-20T14:31:28.404273+00:00","id":1320,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"f96eed74-f4d3-4789-988f-ad9794f6cc65"},"_deposit":{"created_by":4,"id":"1320","owners":[4],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1320"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:u-hyogo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001320","sets":["244:211:467"]},"author_link":["1864","1865"],"item_4_biblio_info_12":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2006-03-15","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"26","bibliographicPageStart":"13","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"13","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"兵庫県立大学看護学部紀要"},{"bibliographic_title":"University of Hyogo College of Nursing art and Science bulletin","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_4_description_10":{"attribute_name":"抄録(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"思想家としてのジークムント・フロイトとルートビッヒ・フォン・ミーゼスは、知的な前提を共有していて、彼らの歴史的、文化的な背景に明らかな類似性があるなどということをはるかに越えている。この類似性の4つは、とくに論述する価値がある。反唯物論、歴史的進歩に対する懐疑論、人類の第一義的特徴としての精神的目的(あるいは別表現では意識)、および方法論的な合理主義。ミーゼス、フロイトの両者とも、人間の動機を理解する際、生物としての必要性の重要性を強調する唯物論者の還元主義を拒絶する。彼らは両方とも、現代の「進歩的」運動は、人間の本性についての幻想的な楽観主義に基づいており、社会的組織はこの本性として見出される、と見ていた。理論や認識論に関するミーゼスの著作において、とくに彼は、フロイトによって書かれた著作への評価を示し、こう言っている。すなわち、フロイトの著作における無意識の精神は、明示的に理由づけられ宣言された選択という現象、つまりその現象の研究でミーゼスが「プラキシオロジー」と名づけたものの背後にある、目的誘導システムである、と。このことは、プラキシオロジーと非科学者的形態における心理学との同一性も、それらの相互補完性も、両方とも明らかにした(つまり、心理分析や、ミーゼスが「チイモロギ」と名づけた研究のように言葉で記述される心理学)。ミーゼスは、フロイトと同じ程度に、詳しく研究するための原理として人間本性を考えることを頑固に支持する一方、人間行動は相矛盾的で自己破壊的である、と認識する。人間は、合理的にその本性を反映させる潜在力を持っているのに、事実上、幻想に屈服するものであるということは、この2人の思想家に共有された前提であったが、それは、彼らの同時代人の多くには不評であった。ミーゼスは、左翼に対する社会的および経済的な万能薬と闘うことに全生涯を費やしたが、一方、フロイトは、彼のリビドー理論の文脈をはずし、それを性的ユートピア主義と論じた人々に対して反論することに成熟期を費やした。しかしながら、フロイトとミーゼスを悲観論者であるとか、保守主義者であるとか呼ぶのは誤りであろう。むしろ彼らは、両方とも、同時代の多くの人が共有していた、より現実的な仮定に基づいた人間条件を改善しようと懸命に努力したのであった。フロイトとミーゼスは、幻想とともに幻滅からの脱出を通して希望を指し示したのである。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"As thinkers, psychologist Sigmund Freud and economist Ludwig von Mises shared intellectual presuppositions which go far beyond the obvious similarities which might be expected from the overlap in their early 20^<th> century Viennese cultural background. Four of these are worthy of particular mention: anti-materialism, skepticism concerning historical progress, mental purpose (conscious or otherwise) as a primary characteristic of human beings, and methodological rationalism. Both Mises and Freud rejected materialist reductionism while stressing the importance of biological needs in understanding human motives. Both of them saw that modern \"progressive\" movements were based on illusory optimism about human nature and the social organizations founded on this nature. In Mises' works on theory and epistemology, especially, he demonstrates his appreciation of the work which had been done by Freud to show that the unconscious mind is a purpose-driven system which lies behind the phenomena of explicitly reasoned and manifested choice, phenomena the study of which Mises termed \"praxiology\". This reveals both a similarity between and complementary among praxiology and psychology in its non-scientistic forms (ie. verbally descriptive psychologies such as psychoanalysis, studies which Mises termed \"thymology\"). Mises, no less than Freud, recognized that much human activity is contradictory and self-defeating, while stubbornly adhering to reason as a principle for investigating human nature. The potential of humans to reflect on their natures rationally while, in practice, succumbing to illusion was a premise shared by the two thinkers but unpalatable to many of their contemporaries. Mises spent his life combating social and economic panaceas of the left, while Freud spent his mature years countering the sexual utopianism of those who had taken his libido theory out of context. However it would be wrong to call Freud and Mises pessimists or even conservatives. Rather they both strove to improve the human condition on the basis of more realistic assumptions than those shared by many of their contemporaries. Both Freud and Mises offered hope through disenchantment with illusions.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_15":{"attribute_name":"表示順","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"5","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_16":{"attribute_name":"アクセション番号","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"KJ00004418565","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_8":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論文","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_9":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Original","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_source_id_1":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12013173","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_19":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"13498991","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_text_6":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"兵庫県立大学看護学部 外国語系"}]},"item_4_text_7":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Foreign Languages, College of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"サンワル, マーク"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1864","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"SUNWALL, Mark","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1865","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-05-10"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00004418565.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KJ00004418565.pdf","url":"https://u-hyogo.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1320/files/KJ00004418565.pdf"},"version_id":"38f85458-fada-4c72-981e-5d70340c383f"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"心理学","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"思想歴史","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"経済学","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"哲学","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"文化的心理学=チイモロギ","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Psychology","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Intellectual History","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Economics","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Philosophy","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Thymology (literary psychology)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"ミーゼスによるフロイト論 : 精神と行動の関係","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"ミーゼスによるフロイト論 : 精神と行動の関係"},{"subitem_title":"Mises on Freud : The relation of mind and action","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"4","path":["467"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2017-05-10"},"publish_date":"2017-05-10","publish_status":"0","recid":"1320","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["ミーゼスによるフロイト論 : 精神と行動の関係"],"weko_creator_id":"4","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T16:34:35.931566+00:00"}